Analyse etiologies (in terms of biological, cognitive and/or sociocultural factors) of one anxiety/affective/eating disorder. (8)

Analyse (8) – Break down in order to bring out the essential elements or structure.



Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (anxiety disorder)

Biological etiologies of OCD
Genetic predisposition

McKeon and Murray – OCD prevalence
Description Relatives of OCD patients were more likely than the rest of the population to suffer from anxiety disorders in general, but no more likely to suffer specifically from OCD.

Neurological factor

Baxter et al. – Caudate Nucleus and OCD
[A] Observe the differences in brain function in patients with OCD before and after successful treatment.
[P]
  • PET scanning was used to identify active areas of the brain.
[F]
  • The right Caudate Nucleus became more active in patients after treatment.
[C]
  • There is a correlation between the activity of the Caudate Nucleus and OCD.

Neurotransmission


Cognitive etiologies of OCD

Cognitive Triad (Theorist: Beck)
Self <=> World <=> Future
Example:



Socio-cultural etiologies of OCD

Sullivan – Factors Related to OCD
[A] Examining the relation between academic majors/minors of college students, birth order, gender, level of stress, locus of control and the amount of obsessive-compulsive (OC) behaviors.
[P]
  • All participants were selected through convenience sampling.
  • A sample of 75 undergraduate students was surveyed.
  • 51 females, 24 males
  • 46 students with science/business majors/minors
  • 26 students with liberal arts/humanities majors/minors
  • 30 first born or only children
  • 43 standing lower in the birth order
  • Questionnaires assessing OC behavior using a 1-7 Likert scale were administered to participants.
  • Questions were based on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), including 26 questions measuring obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors.
  • Relationships between the different demographics and OC behaviour were determined using a t-test or a Pearson Correlation.
[F]
  • Results supports the following hypothesis:
  • Females reporting more OC behaviors.
  • Participants with greater stress level reporting more OC behaviors.
  • Results do not support the following hypothesis:
  • First born and only children reporting more OC behaviors.
  • Students with external locus of control reporting more OC behaviors.
  • Difference in the amount of OC behaviors among students in Science majors/minors vs. Liberal Arts/humanities majors/minors.
[C]
  • Greater stress level means higher level of anxiety.
  • Prevalence of OC behaviour in this demographic can arguably be a response to sooth the high anxiety level.
  • Corresponds to previous studies (Bogetto et al., 1999).
  • Most demographics chosen were not equally sampled, and this sample size is not representative of the population.

Full study report can be found here


Depression (affective disorder)

Socio-cultural etiologies of depression
Diathesis Stress Model
Claims that depression may be a result of inherited predisposition and events from the environment (hence dia-thesis, two explanations).

Lewinsohn et al (2001)
Description
  • Studied adolescents who experienced many negative life events over a 12 month period.
  • Those who had strongly negative attributions at the start of the study were much more likely to develop major depression.
  • Diathesis Stress Model (Events from the environment)

Vulnerability Model (Theorist: Brown)

Brown & Harris – Social origins of depression in women
[A] Find out the social origins of depression in women.
[P]
  • Studied women who received hospital treatment for depression.
  • Sampled 458 women in the general population aged between 18 to 65.
[F]
  • 82% of those who became depressed had recently experienced severe life changing event(s).
  • 33% experienced severe life changing event(s) in the non-depressed group.
  • 23% percent working class women became depressed within the past year.
  • 3% in the middle class.
  • Those with a young children were at higher risk of becoming depressed.
[C]
  • Life events that resembled previous experiences were more likely to trigger depression.
[E]
  • Relatively big sample group, representable of the general population, results can be generalised.
  • Cultural factors were not taken into consideration.

Symptoms of depression in different cultures – Marsella

Prince – Depression in Africa and Asia
Study brief
  • Study claims that there were no signs of depression in Africa and parts of Asia.
  • Reported depression rose with westernization in colonial countries.
[E]
  • Researchers argue that depression is not exactly the same globally.
  • Depression may be expressed differently and may escape the attention of people from different cultures.
  • Asian and African countries tend to be more collectivist.
  • People from collectivist society might not report depression since it might affect others in the social network.



Cognitive etiologies of depression
Learned helplessness and hopelessness (Theorist: Seligman)

Seligman – Learned Helplessness Dog Study (Depression)
[A] Prove that Learned Helplessness can lead to depression.
[P]
  • A dog was trapped in an enclosed area where the floor was lined with electrodes.
  • The experimenter would activate the electrode once in a while.
  • The dog would jump over a low wall to the other side of the enclosed area where no electrodes were on the floor.
  • The experimenter raised the wall slowly until it was too high for the dog to jump over.
  • Then after a few trials, the experimenter lowered the wall again.
[F]
  • The dog gave the high wall a few attempts.
  • But after knowing that it is impossible to jump across, the dog gave up and let itself get electrocuted.
  • When the walls were lowered again, the dog did not attempt to jump across.
[C]
  • The dog learnt that he is incapable of jumping across.
  • Learn that its are helpless therefore lowering its self esteem.
[E]
  • Low in ecological validity, lab experiment.
  • Controlled, no confounding variable.
  • Animal experiment can provide insight into human behaviour.
  • Unethical, participants did not have rights to withdraw.
  • Induced fear and depression into participants.

Faulty attributions (Theorist: Abramson)