Discuss cultural and ethical considerations in diagnosis. (22)
Discuss (22) – A considered and balanced review, including a range of arguments, factors or hypothesis. Opinions and conclusions presented clearly supported by appropriate evidence.
Classification/Diagnosis systems
- Classification systems are suppose to be objective.
- Traditional medical model in psychiatry is now assumed to be reductionist.
- Most psychiatrists use a biopsychosocial approach in diagnosis and treatment.
- Diagnose based on symptoms.
- Affective (mood) symptoms
- Behavioural symptoms
- Cognitive (thought process) symptoms
- Somatic (physical) symptoms
- Based heavily upon abnormal experiences and belief reported by patients.
- Agreed by a team of professionals.
- Explains why Classification/Diagnosis systems are often updated and revised.
Strengths of classification systems
- Statistical diagnosis
- Quantifiable
- Ability to identify disorders based on symptoms
- Therefore suitable treatment can be applied
Weakness of classification systems
- Ethical consideration is the main weakness of Classification systems
- The effects of labeling
- Leads to stigmatisation
- Prejudice and discrimination
- Self labeling can lead to Self-fulfilling prophecy
- Person diagnosed with disorder act according to the label
Cultural considerations
- An individual’s behaviour is governed to an extent by the culture they are brought up in.
- There are likely to be different perceptions of behaviour in different cultures, different cultural norms.
- A tendency to favor one’s own cultural view of the world.
- Studies on psychological disorders originated from the west, hence the tendency that the diagnosis system favor the western culture.
Erinosho & Ayonrinde – Nigeria Yoruba Tribe study |
[A] |
Investigate the cultural differences in criteria of normality and abnormality. |
[P] |
- Participants were tribesmen from the Yoruba tribe in Nigeria.
- Information of patients with schizophrenia were presented to people of the Yoruba Tribe.
|
[F] |
- Only 40% of the tribesmen from the Yoruba tribe identified the patients as mentally ill.
- 30% of the tribesmen said they would marry such person.
- This maybe due to the cultural differences between the tribesmen and the westernized world (see Binitie’s study).
|
[C] |
- Shows the importance of an emic approach in studies.
- The ability to identify the definition of “abnormality” in different cultures can only be done in culture specific approach in studies.
|
Binitie – Schizophrenia in Nigeria |
[A] |
Investigate the cultural differences in criteria of normality and abnormality. |
[P] |
- Participants were Nigerians living in the city.
- Information of patients with schizophrenia were presented to the participants.
|
[F] |
- Most participants correctly identified the patients as mentally ill.
- 31% showed aggressive response to such patients e.g. suggesting that they should be expelled or shot.
|
[C] |
- Shows how western culture has influenced the judgement of normality (compared with Yoruba tribe study).
|
Overall conclusion
- Seems that Schizophrenia is a western model, Tribal Nigerians did not see hallucination as something negative.
- Cultural relativism suggests that abnormality is subjective cross culturally.
- Hallucinations and cultural perspectives was also investigated in the Kasamatsu & Hirai – Monk Serotonin Study. Hallucination is seen to be a spiritual experience by Japanese monks.
DCM vs CCMD
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DCM) – Internationally recognised diagnosis system, westernised model.
- Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders (CCMD) – China specific diagnosis system based upon the chinese cultural background.
- The need for more than one classification systems suggests that culture has its effect on the criteria for abnormality and syndromes.
- Uses different criteria in the different classification systems.
- Takes care of certain Culture-Bound Syndromes.
Ethical considerations
- Ethical concerns regarding diagnosis mainly surround the issue of Labeling and its consequences.
- After diagnosis, the patient will inevitably be labeled with the diagnosed illness.
- Labeling will cause Stigmatisation.
- Where the patient will have a negative persona attached to them because they are labeled as mentally ill.
Depersonalisation and powerlessness
- Removal of human rights, frequent verbal or physical abuse.
- Usually seen in mental institutes.
- Demonstrated in Rosenhan’s study.
- Participants reported that cases of depersonalisation were observed in the institute.
- This thereby worsens the mental illness.
Self-fulfilling prophecy
- Patients may start to act according to the label they were given because they think they should act that way.
- Demonstrated in Scheff’s Labeling theory.
- “Scheff (1966) argued that receiving a psychiatric diagnosis creates a stigma or mark of social disgrace.” (Turner, 77)
- Showed criticism toward the classification systems, in particular the diagnosis of schizophrenia.
- Schizophrenic does not mean that they will break formal and obvious rules;
- But residual rule breaking (basically breaking the norm i.e. talking to themselves).
- He argued that many people breaks residual rules, but only those referred to a psychiatrist acquire a label, which influences their behaviour.
Prejudice and discrimination
- Demonstrated in Rosenhan’s study
- Stickiness of diagnostic labels
- When an individual returns to society, their record of mental illness goes with them.
- The pseudo-patients left with a diagnosis of ‘schizophrenia in remission’.
- This can lead to stigmatisation, stereotyping and discrimination against those who have been mentally disordered.
- Making reintegration back into the community difficult.